For E.F., 16, who is reading the book and deserves so much better than Christian Grey.
It’s the book that everyone’s talking about . Opinion is divided between those who love it, those who hate it and those who would rather eat poo than dignify it with their attention. With her Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy, E L James has achieved what most authors – even good ones – can only dream of; international fame, a multimillion dollar best seller, and a major movie deal .
Much of the anger (jealousy?) about the book stems from the fact that something so poorly written has achieved such astounding success. In sporting terms it’s akin to Danny de Vito winning gold in the Olympic marathon. In intellectual terms, it’s Paris Hilton winning the Nobel Prize for Science. It just doesn’t seem fair. In fact it has many intellectuals muttering fifty shades of ‘Grrrrr’.
I read the three books in the Fifty Shades trilogy during my recent vacation. I’m not one of those who looks down her nose at popular fiction. I actually rather like Mills & Boon and Harlequin Romances. I’d certainly rather read a Mills & Boon than plough through the turgid prose of James Joyce or Patrick White. And if that makes me a Philistine well, so be it.
I’ve never understood the venomous intellectual reaction to women’s popular fiction. Sure, it’s not great art, but variety is the spice of life, and I know many very smart, very well educated women (and a few men) who love a good romance, or a steamy bodice ripper. And, if women’s romance fiction is so easy to write, why aren’t we all churning out best-sellers?
Beautifully written literature is as much a joy as exquisitely cooked food. But consider, as wonderful as a meal from Heston Blumenthal might be, is that really what you want to eat every night? Not me! I love gourmet food, but there are some nights when canned spaghetti on toast, macaroni and cheese, KFC or even McDonalds are exactly right for my mood. Why can’t we look at literature the same way?
Good writing is certainly to be encouraged and admired, but it’s obviously not the only requirement for literary success. As E L James has shown, telling a story that is intriguing, engaging, controversial and compelling is just as important as exquisitely beautiful, technically masterful prose. In fact, what has literary critics turning fifty shades of puce is that James has shown that good writing is an entirely optional component of writing a best seller. But, in deriding James for her literary short-comings, her critics fail to acknowledge the extraordinary talent it takes to achieve her level of success and public engagement in spite of her clunky prose. James has done what most of us so-called ‘good’ writers never will – she has tapped into the public imagination, filled a niche that no-one else saw, and sparked an international debate about sex and sexism, sadism and submission, sodomy and syntax. If, as cultural theorists tell us, culture is something that’s ‘good to think with’, Fifty Shades of Grey is a cultural triumph. That’s quite an achievement for an author with such a limited vocabulary!
Yes, there are things about James’ writing that made me go ‘grrrrr’. The repetitive use of particular words is my major literary gripe. How many times do Anastasia’s clothes ‘pool’ at her feet, or her tears ‘pool’ in her eyes? How many times does she ‘fist’ poor Christian’s hair or he hers? How many times does she mutter, “Oh my!” or coyly refer to her genitals as ‘down there’. Perhaps with all those millions in the bank, a thesaurus might be a wise investment before EL James embarks on the next book. And you just know there will be a next book – probably a next trilogy. After all, we still don’t know whether Mia got to bonk Ethan – there has to be another book in that! I’m predicting that Fifty Shades will be the next Flowers in the Attic – book after interminable book – even after poor old E L James is dead and buried!
But E L James’ writing is the least of my concerns about the Fifty Shades trilogy. I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed reading the books. It was fun; fifty shades of grrrreat. But, tempering the fun has been the return of awful nightmares which have me waking in the middle of the night in a cold sweat; shaking, weeping and bereft. Why? Because I had a nine year relationship with Christian Grey – or a good facsimile thereof. Unlike Anastasia, my Christian didn’t turn into the perfect husband and father. My Christian nearly destroyed me.
As much as I enjoyed reading the Fifty Shades books, they resurrected a whole slew of unwelcome memories and pain for me – as I’m sure they have for many other women who’ve been involved with ‘real life’ Christian Greys. The fact is, that, in real life, there is nothing romantic about being in a relationship with a man who is moody, jealous, controlling, secretive, emotionally unavailable and sexually aggressive. In real life, such men are more likely to kill you – or make you want to kill yourself – than be miraculously transformed by a woman’s love. Yes, even yours.
An older woman, speaking from experience, once said to me, “Never fall in love with a man with ‘potential’ – the potential is very rarely realised. If only I’d listened.
Yes, I fell in love with a real-life version of Christian Grey. Yes, he was very, very handsome, very, very masculine, and as far as I could tell, very, very successful. But, of course, he had ‘issues’. Foolishly, I thought I could ‘transform’ him if only I loved him enough, if only I didn’t push his buttons, if only I was patient, if only I agreed to be treated like a doormat, if only I helped fulfil his fantasies, if only I didn’t pry, if only I didn’t want more than he was prepared to give, if only, if only, if only.
Oh yes! I was every shade of Anastasia Steele. Sometimes I tried to stand my ground. Often we fought. Often we broke up, but always one or the other of us couldn’t stand it and we’d reunite – usually with ‘kinky fuckery’ rather than any meaningful conversation. But nothing would change. Friction, arguments, break-ups and make-ups – they all seem sooooo romantic in fiction. In real life, however, they’re psychologically and emotionally destructive, they strip you of your dignity and the more you keep going back, the more you buy in to the role of masochistic submissive.
It’s not exciting or romantic and it doesn’t make you happy. But, after a year or nine on the roller coaster of dealing with a Christian Grey, you’re so worn down and emotionally damaged you think you don’t deserve any better. By then, you’re so pathetically grateful for any crumb from his table that you interpret it as evidence that you’re ‘getting somewhere’. Of course, you’re not. He will never change. You, on the other hand, are being systematically emotionally obliterated.
It’s true that he never hit me. Looking back, I wish he had. If he’d hit me, I might have realized much earlier that I was being abused.
It took nine years for me to find out that my Christian was never going to fulfil the potential I saw in him. After nine long years I was still nothing better than a mistress (and with none of the financial rewards!). He lied, he cheated, he was psychologically abusive, and, I found, I wasn’t the only woman he was lying to. The successful job and ‘wealth’ were no more than an illusion. In fact, the whole relationship was an illusion. Every single thing he told me over nine years was a lie. I’d been living in Wonderland – a fictional world he created in order to keep me in my place – and away from his real life.
It took two nervous breakdowns and a suicide attempt before I was finally free. I lost everything – my career, my financial stability, my health, my ability to work, my self-confidence, my willingness to risk another relationship, and my chance at having a husband and children. I’d traded everything for the ‘potential’ of turning a frog into a prince. Instead, the frog turned me into a toad. Anything I have now, has been clawed back from the wreckage.
I was physically free of him, but never really free because the scars that kind of relationship inflict on you never heal. You are never the same; never whole again. Oh yes. For a while you’ll think you’re fine and then, one day, you’ll pick up a book like Fifty Shades of Grey which romanticizes the kind of relationship that nearly cost you your life and it brings it all rushing back.
So, you see, what makes me go fifty shades of ‘grrrrr’ about Fifty Shades of Grey isn’t James’ poor writing, it’s my concern that younger women – and particularly girls – might read these books and think that, just like Anastasia, they might be ‘lucky’ enough to find some poor, broken man with ‘issues’; that, through the strength of their love, they will transform him into all the good shades of Christian Grey – loving, generous, playful, protective, sharing and cherishing. “Oh my!”(as Ana would say), Christian on his best behaviour is every woman’s dream! Who wouldn’t want to live ‘happily ever after’ with good Christian?
But Christian isn’t real. He is an entirely fictional character and bears no resemblance whatsoever to real life men-with-issues. The truth is that women who take up with these kinds of controlling, mercurial, dominating men too often end up black and blue, physically and/or emotionally broken, or, worse, dead – either at his hand or their own. That’s what makes me go fifty shades of ‘grrrrr’ about Fifty Shades of Grey.
Am I suggesting that young women shouldn’t read Fifty Shades? Not at all! In fact, I’d encourage it. But I’d also encourage mothers and sisters and aunts – even fathers – to read the books and use them as a basis for discussion. Let’s not hide the issues raised in Fifty Shades of Grey – let’s talk openly about the psychological, physical and sexual abuse of women and the fact that it’s not acceptable and it’s certainly not romantic. Let’s talk about the fact that men-with-issues need to sort their own shit out – it’s not our job to save them. Let’s talk about the fact that being someone’s emotional or physical punching bag is not helping them (or you!) towards good psychological health.
Generally, I hope that women can distinguish between Christian Grey as a fantasy figure and real-life men with similar traits. Yes, we women sometimes fantasise about being dominated, about being bound up, even about being raped. But while fantasising about rape might be titillating, it doesn’t mean it’s something you actually want to happen in real life. Just so, I’m fervently hoping that when women read Fifty Shades of Grey, they’ll consider that the fantasy of Christian Grey is quite different to the reality. While it might be titillating to think about a relationship with this delectable but complicated Adonis, embarking on a relationship with one of his real-life counterparts is more likely to leave a woman either dead or fifty shades of completely fucked up.

Wow, this assessment of the book is very moving, Chrys.
I think for most of us, it’s just fantasy porn. How could it be anything but fantasy with such a ridiculously happy ending? (And who can orgasm three times in half an hour – or is that just me?
)
For you, it’s brought back unpleasant memories and I’m so sorry to hear about your painful nine year experience.
My 18yo daughter has read it and we’ve talked about it at length. I think the younger girls are responding very differently from older women. My daughter is disparaging of the books. She doesn’t like Ana and how she behaves. She sees Christian’s faults plainly. Younger girls may imagine themselves faced with issues like this so they have to keep it real.
OTOH, older women, from all I’ve talked to, respond differently. We can indulge in the fantasy and uncritically lose ourselves in the story. It’s adding welcome spice to our relationships. Hence “mummy porn”.
I see the danger is that if these books persuade less savvy young girls to try and change damaged men, they’ll learn the hard way it rarely works in real life. These girls need older female mentors to discuss it with.
As you say, it can’t be bad if it promotes discussion.
Thank you for your frankness. It’s very affecting. Much love.
Hmm. Interesting, Chrys. I have not read this book and I probably won’t. I’m somewhat ashamed to say so, but I can partly identify with Christian. I got into a relationship with a lady in my early twenties. It was not a relationship that I particularly wanted but she did. I just went along for the ride, so to speak. I was far too immature to be able to sustain such a relationship, and I was not committed to it. I hurt that lady badly. Emotionally, not physically. Not intentionally. Not maliciously. I just didn’t stop to think about what I was doing. It was only later that I realized the full extent of what I had done.Thankfully she later found someone else and got married. Anyway, your Christian sounds like he was really a bad man, and I hope I am not that.
Chrys, this reflection on this book in the context of your own life story makes compelling reading. Men with unresolved issues before marriage are a monty to stay that way after marriage. And these kinds of men are dangerous to their wives and to any children the two of them may have. But …. I am, as a man, very grateful for this outstanding article. And I would commend it to all as a must read.
Wow and further, WOW. What a piece of compelling reading you have just written. I have not read this book but have read many reviews and comments about it. I have no interest at all in it, but I DO have an interest in your writing.
Your personalising the characters, exposing the ‘fanatasy’ with your real life experience is a gift to us all ( and BTW rape has never been one of my fantasies…too close to being molested as a 7 year old I guess).
Thank you AGAIN for an amazing piece of personalised, profoundly piercing prose that caused me to read it aloud so that I could ‘feel’ your passion and pain in my throat.
(PS You nearly stopped me reading with; “plough through the turgid prose of James Joyce or Patrick White”. I find White’s literary drawing of women delicious and breathtaking ie The Tree of Man being my most favourite of all novels, just pipping Winton’s Cloudstreet.)
Hi Chris I really appreciated this rant and wanted to share my story with you. My 39 year old daughter is to be married on the 15th September to a ‘real’ person of the opposite sex. She has had 2 long term relationships (and 2 beautiful children) with ‘Christian Grey’ types. (I have not read the books but picked up on the drift from those who have). The sad thing is that she has no insight into the first two relationships. The great thing is that ‘the golden haired one’ that she is about to marry does. He hs no airs and graces, is not tall dark & handsome, is not wealthy, has no ‘special’ talents – he is just a lovely person AND I will dance (probably a bit intoxicated) at the wedding – VBG. Regards Chris Gavenlock
Chrys, as so often before, your very eloquent (and elegant) writing impresses me, and gets me thinking. I do not always agree, but you make your point so well, that I feel enriched by your views. I have not read the books, and do not intend to: they have no interest for me, as I am older and in a very happy long-term relationship with a great man. I thought the books would be trashy, and it seems in some senses they may be. But your very astute dealing with what they can offer to others poses another view worth considering. Means one should be thoughtful before rushing to judgment, eh? (I am some reservations that the books could do some harm when not approached critically).
Chrys, this is review that ought to get wider circulation than your blog – a very brave personal response, which you have shared, and good feminist analysis of a piece of popular fiction and its potential [sorry] to raise unrealistic expectations in impressionable young women. I would see that the dangers you point to are enhanced by immature sexual expectations of some younger adults from internet porn and the underlying themes of sadism, violence and manipulation that underscore much of what passes for sexual relationships on too many websites. However, the comments on your piece so far in their sum are encouraging.
Thanks so much Chrys for your honesty in talking about the book and reflecting on your life.
Interesting how occasionally you will read a book that really resonates with you. I just read “Why be happy when you can be normal?” by Jeanette Winterson. It too hit a nerve with me and brought back memories of psychological harm from religion.
Thank you, from one Mills & Boon lover to another.
A thought provoking and stimulating read. Reminiscent of something I once did, or rather, was once done to me. Thank you.
A heartfelt tale and good review. While I agree with your warnings to young women, it behoves me to point out that at least as many men are maltreated by their partners as partners by them. This violence usually goes unreported because of such things as fear of losing their macho image, unsympathetic response from police and courts, jeers from people who say; ‘sticks and stones will break your bones but names will never hurt us’, and then deny that a woman can hurt a man. Feminists have told us all men are rapists and all women are peace-loving homemakers. This is not true. The power of a fist is terrifying to a woman, but to a man the really terrible thing is the power of words calculated to emasculate. Discussions of conjugal violence should always include both sides of the coin. To a woman, sneering contempt and verbal putdowns are easily shrugged off; to men they’re mortal wounds. OK, men must learn to react non-violently, but women must learn verbal sensitivity.
Feminists have told us all men are rapists
Uh… you do realise that the “all men are rapists” quote comes from a character in a fiction novel, don’t you? And that the author of the novel, Marilyn French, never said anything of the sort herself?
… and all women are peace-loving homemakers
Really? Feminists say this? Citations, please.
The power of a fist is terrifying to a woman, but to a man the really terrible thing is the power of words calculated to emasculate.
Are you really going to sit there and try to equate physical violence with insults? Do you honestly believe that having your ego dented is as bad as having your face smashed in?
Discussions of conjugal violence should always include both sides of the coin.
Translation: She deserved it! She provoked me!
To a woman, sneering contempt and verbal putdowns are easily shrugged off
Is that so? And how do you know this? Personal experience, perhaps?
to men they’re mortal wounds
Oh, waah waah! Someone called me a bad name! Grow up, will you. Verbal abuse should NEVER be used to justify or trivialise violence against women, as you have tried to do here. You should be ashamed of yourself.
I’d just like to make a couple of comments.
One of the problems with domestic violence is that many women (and men) only believe it’s ‘violence’ if they’ve actually been punched with a closed fist. Speaking to a counselor from a women’s shelter, I found that it’s very common for women to say, “Oh, but he doesn’t hit me … well, he doesn’t punch me …. if he hits me at all, it’s a slap or a push … but he doesn’t really ‘hit’ me.”
Domestic violence is not just punching and kicking. It IS psychological and financial abuse as well. It IS pushing and shoving and insulting and belittling.
Now, I’d agree wholeheartedly that it’s not just women who suffer domestic abuse. I’d also agree that verbal and psychological abuse against men (insulting, emasculating, belittling) can be just as painful as it is for women. Of course, no one wants to be punched in the face – but we should not assume that verbal/psychological violence is somehow ‘better’.
When it comes to physical abuse, however, in general – not always of course – women are at a distinct disadvantage. It is also true that sometimes – not always – women are at an economic disadvantage and that this can deter them from leaving a physically or psychologically harmful environment. Of course, this may sometimes be the case for men, but less often I would think.
Ultimately, this is not a ‘pissing contest’ between male and female victims. The point is NO-ONE should be the victim of abuse – male, female, gay or straight, child or adult. That’s really the point.
Excellent post, Chrys. Thank you for your honesty. I think you put your finger on one of the reasons I found the book disturbing too – relationships with those controlling men never turn out well in real life. I have just watched someone I know well extricate herself from a marriage where she thought she could ‘transform’ the man and help him with his issues – she couldn’t – but it took a lot of pain to get to that point and end the relationship. Anyway, I just couldn’t find Christian in the book attractive at all, and I found the whole set up distressing. I couldn’t get past 3/5ths of the first book.
One of my brothers was in an abusive relationship with a woman. She was physically, financially and psychologically abusing him throughout. He often had bruises and the like from where she had hit him. She constantly drained his accounts. She threatened suicide, murder and self-inflicted (via violence) to their unborn child to stop him from having any contact with us or with his other child.
Why didn’t he leave straight away? He of course had a loving family desperate for him to do so and who would have supported him. But he was concerned for his unborn child and for her other children (she’s a lousy mother).. It was only after his daughter was born and had grown for a few months that he felt he was finally in a position to leave her safely (and involving the police initially to make sure that she wouldn’t do anything bad to their child). They now have split custody and he’s since found a lovely new woman and married her.
My point is, sometimes it’s just as impossible for a man to leave an abusive relationship as it is a woman.
Thank you so much for your perspective on this. It was incredibly courageous of you. My little Miss E.F was very excited that it was written with her mind. Sometimes it is just fantastic when your 16 year old can open new windows and view new things through the wisdom and experience of other older women besides Mum. They tend to absorb it with a little more interest and passion. This is one of those fantastic moments! XX Thank you